This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [Patch 1/3] Use manual regex algorithm switching


--- a/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/regex.tcc
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/regex.tcc
@@ -28,12 +28,12 @@
 *  Do not attempt to use it directly. @headername{regex}
 */

-// See below __regex_algo_impl to get what this is talking about. The default
-// value 1 indicated a conservative optimization without giving up worst case
-// performance.
-#ifndef _GLIBCXX_REGEX_DFS_QUANTIFIERS_LIMIT
-#define _GLIBCXX_REGEX_DFS_QUANTIFIERS_LIMIT 1
-#endif
+// A non-standard switch to let the user pick the matching algorithm.
+// If _GLIBCXX_REGEX_USE_THOMPSON_NFA is defined, the thompson NFA
+// algorithm will be used. This algorithm is not by default, and cannot

This should say "not enabled by default" or "not used by default".

+// be used if the regex contains back-references, but has better
+// (polynomial instead of exponential) worst case performace.
+// See __regex_algo_impl below.

namespace std _GLIBCXX_VISIBILITY(default)
{
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION

      // This function decide which executor to use under given circumstances.
      // The _S_auto policy now is the following: if a NFA has no
-      // back-references and has more than _GLIBCXX_REGEX_DFS_QUANTIFIERS_LIMIT
+      // back-references and has more than _GLIBCXX_REGEX_USE_THOMPSON_NFA

This comment needs more than just a simple replacement, as the way the
macro is used changed, not just its name.

      // quantifiers (*, +, ?), the BFS executor will be used, other wise
      // DFS executor. This is because DFS executor has a exponential upper
      // bound, but better best-case performace. Meanwhile, BFS executor can
@@ -82,8 +82,10 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
      bool __ret;
      if (!__re._M_automaton->_M_has_backref
	  && (__policy == _RegexExecutorPolicy::_S_alternate
-	      || __re._M_automaton->_M_quant_count
-		> _GLIBCXX_REGEX_DFS_QUANTIFIERS_LIMIT))
+#ifdef _GLIBCXX_REGEX_USE_THOMPSON_NFA
+	      || true
+#endif
+	      ))

I wonder if this would be simpler to read like this:

       if (!__re._M_automaton->_M_has_backref
#ifndef _GLIBCXX_REGEX_USE_THOMPSON_NFA
 	   && __policy == _RegexExecutorPolicy::_S_alternate
#endif
          )

What do you think?


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]