This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: Try to catch up _GLIBCXX_RESOLVE_LIB_DEFECTS comments and documentation.
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com>
- To: Ed Smith-Rowland <3dw4rd at verizon dot net>
- Cc: "libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org" <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 10:33:56 +0000
- Subject: Re: Try to catch up _GLIBCXX_RESOLVE_LIB_DEFECTS comments and documentation.
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <532467D4 dot 9080407 at verizon dot net> <CAH6eHdSMNdoxOWUrAaBiJC7dioLp2xv+6D9zyJ+GMo5KwwnZOQ at mail dot gmail dot com> <5325CCA5 dot 4070105 at verizon dot net>
On 16 March 2014 16:09, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
> OK, thinking further on it I actually agree with not mentioning DRs on a
> partially baked standard. We advertise that support for new standards is
> experimental.
I don't think it does any harm to add comments during the C++1y/C++1z
process to note that we've incorporated a particular DR against an
earlier working paper, because it's not always obvious which draft our
work-in-progress follows, but once the standard is finished I'd be in
favour of removing those comments. Implementing those DRs is implied
by implementing the finished standard.