This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [wwwdocs] Mention libstdc++-v3 <regex> in 4.9 changes.html

From: Paolo Carlini <paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com>
To: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald at pfeifer dot com>, Tim Shen <timshen91 at gmail dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, libstdc++ <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2013 12:41:06 +0200
Subject: Re: [wwwdocs] Mention libstdc++-v3 <regex> in 4.9 changes.html
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
References: <CAPrifDmKnBGJnjXH5T-pt=4y84_jXS28=-QUh49OGYitaZ2Xmw at mail dot gmail dot com> <alpine dot LNX dot 2 dot 00 dot 1310021218210 dot 2211 at trevally dot site>

Hi,

On 10/02/2013 12:19 PM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:

On Tue, 1 Oct 2013, Tim Shen wrote:

Hi, libstdc++-v3 <regex> is ready for releasing.

Nice!

Is it Ok to apply? By the way, do we need a News entry for this
improvement?

Yes, and yes. :-)

Just one question "improved experimental support" sounds a bit
weak.  I think I understand where it is coming from, but is there
a way to market this a bit stronger?

Minimally, I would talk about "improved support": the evolution from-std=c++0x to -std=c++11 meant that we aren't in experimental mode anymore.


Paolo.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [wwwdocs] Mention libstdc++-v3 <regex> in 4.9 changes.html
  - From: Jonathan Wakely

References:
- [wwwdocs] Mention libstdc++-v3 <regex> in 4.9 changes.html
  - From: Tim Shen
- Re: [wwwdocs] Mention libstdc++-v3 <regex> in 4.9 changes.html
  - From: Gerald Pfeifer

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]