This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Remove algo logic duplication Round 3

From: Marc Glisse <marc dot glisse at inria dot fr>
To: Paolo Carlini <paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com>
Cc: libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 01:37:37 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: Re: Remove algo logic duplication Round 3
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
References: <52409F6F dot 7040609 at gmail dot com> <alpine dot DEB dot 2 dot 10 dot 1309232317070 dot 4088 at laptop-mg dot saclay dot inria dot fr> <5240B539 dot 1050202 at oracle dot com> <alpine dot DEB dot 2 dot 10 dot 1309232345420 dot 4088 at laptop-mg dot saclay dot inria dot fr> <5240BA10 dot 4090400 at oracle dot com> <alpine dot DEB dot 2 dot 10 dot 1309240028450 dot 4088 at laptop-mg dot saclay dot inria dot fr> <5240C28A dot 4040402 at oracle dot com> <5240C3C4 dot 8020305 at oracle dot com>
Reply-to: libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org

On Mon, 23 Sep 2013, Paolo Carlini wrote:

Hi again,

On 9/23/13 5:36 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51680
Funny, I don't remember making that comment at all, and isn't that old ;)
... but wait, that bug report is *not* about an inline in a member functiondeclaration. Is about an inline in a free standing function. I definitelyagree with myself about that comment.
Did you read all the comments in the audit trail? Do you think the bug reportis relevant for the specific issue we are discussing today, that is *member*functions defined in the body with/without an explicit inline?

Maybe not. Even for free function templates as in the PR, I don't know ifadding inline still makes any difference. As I said, let's forget that.


--
Marc Glisse

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Remove algo logic duplication Round 3
  - From: Christopher Jefferson

References:
- Remove algo logic duplication Round 3
  - From: François Dumont
- Re: Remove algo logic duplication Round 3
  - From: Marc Glisse
- Re: Remove algo logic duplication Round 3
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: Remove algo logic duplication Round 3
  - From: Marc Glisse
- Re: Remove algo logic duplication Round 3
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: Remove algo logic duplication Round 3
  - From: Marc Glisse
- Re: Remove algo logic duplication Round 3
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: Remove algo logic duplication Round 3
  - From: Paolo Carlini

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]