This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: Remove algo logic duplication Round 3
- From: Marc Glisse <marc dot glisse at inria dot fr>
- To: libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 00:30:42 +0200 (CEST)
- Subject: Re: Remove algo logic duplication Round 3
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <52409F6F dot 7040609 at gmail dot com> <alpine dot DEB dot 2 dot 10 dot 1309232317070 dot 4088 at laptop-mg dot saclay dot inria dot fr> <5240B539 dot 1050202 at oracle dot com> <alpine dot DEB dot 2 dot 10 dot 1309232345420 dot 4088 at laptop-mg dot saclay dot inria dot fr> <5240BA10 dot 4090400 at oracle dot com>
- Reply-to: libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
On Mon, 23 Sep 2013, Paolo Carlini wrote:
On 9/23/13 4:48 PM, Marc Glisse wrote:
I meant putting the "inline" keyword explicitly, because the inliner uses
that as a heuristic. But forget it.
Does it really do that?!? Frankly I had no idea that was the case, and in the
library we (I think I can say we, because the code says that) always assume
that since the inline is implicit at least for linkage purposes it was for
actual inlining purposes too, end of the story. Is that "hint" officially
documented somewhere or you reverse engineered somehow by yourself?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51680
--
Marc Glisse