This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: C++ 2014 status page for libstdc++
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com>
- To: Ed Smith-Rowland <3dw4rd at verizon dot net>
- Cc: "libstdc++" <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 12:01:16 +0100
- Subject: Re: C++ 2014 status page for libstdc++
- References: <4173281 dot 333317 dot 1372175119021 dot JavaMail dot root at vznit170132> <CAH6eHdRtF3Q3GVA5t+Ev-TqmPZvMuve6kvwOkbZU6svgSr-2pw at mail dot gmail dot com> <51CA43AF dot 2050800 at verizon dot net>
On 26 June 2013 02:28, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
> On 06/25/2013 11:59 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>>
>> On 25 June 2013 16:45, <3dw4rd@verizon.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> Here is a C++2014 status page for fun and profit.
>>
>> Excellent, thanks!
>>
>>> Tested with xmllint. Are there any other tests I should do?
>>
>> The makefile target to check the docbook manual is:
>> make doc-xml-validate-docbook
>
> Checked clean.
>
>>
>> It should also be linked from doc/xml/manual/intro.xml so it appears
>> as part of the manual.
>
> Done.
>
>>
>> The first paragraph says the table is based on the table of contents
>> of the CD, but it isn't. I agree with only showing the C++14 changes,
>> but the first paragraph should be changed (or removed.)
>>
> Just removed this paragraph.
>
> Applied.
That patch is definitely OK, but please wait for approval before applying!
Thanks again for doing this - I'll try to find time to finish the WIP
stuff I'm W'ing on :)