This is the mail archive of the mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Backport r192458 to gcc-4_7-branch

This is the original thread:

This exact patch was never reverted. It seems to be a second attempt,
that was only applied to trunk that time. I'm cc-ing the original

Smaller patch attached.

            * config/gthr.m4: New. Define GCC_AC_THREAD_HEADER.
            * libgcc/configure: Regenerate.
            * libgcc/ Replace code with GCC_AC_THREAD_HEADER use.
            * libstdc++-v3/ Regenerate.
            * libstdc++-v3/acinclude.m4: Replace code with
            * libstdc++-v3/configure: Regenerate.
            * libstdc++-v3/doc/ Regenerate.
            * libstdc++-v3/include/ Regenerate.
            * libstdc++-v3/include/ Rename variable.
            * libstdc++-v3/libsupc++/ Regenerate.
            * libstdc++-v3/po/ Regenerate.
            * libstdc++-v3/python/ Regenerate.
            * libstdc++-v3/src/ Regenerate.
            * libstdc++-v3/src/c++11/ Regenerate.
            * libstdc++-v3/src/c++98/ Regenerate.
            * libstdc++-v3/testsuite/ Regenerate.

On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 5:24 PM, Jonathan Wakely <> wrote:
> On 14 May 2013 14:14, Evgeniy Stepanov wrote:
>> Hi,
>> this patch merges r192458 into gcc-4_7 to fix separate configure/build
>> of libstdc++.
>> A bit of history: a similar patch was committed to trunk & 4.7 back in
>> Oct'12, then reverted from both, than this patch was committed to
>> trunk only. I wonder if it was simply lost for some reason?
>> Is it OK for backporting to 4.7?
> I'd like to know what problem it solves and why it was reverted before
> making that change on a stable release branch.

Attachment: gthr.patch
Description: Binary data

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]