This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: Add std::unordered_* C++11 allocator support
- From: François Dumont <frs dot dumont at gmail dot com>
- To: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com>, Paolo Carlini <paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com>, "libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org" <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 21:25:07 +0200
- Subject: Re: Add std::unordered_* C++11 allocator support
- References: <51438861 dot 9010207 at gmail dot com> <5145A358 dot 4020104 at oracle dot com> <CAH6eHdQjrkLFa2rNZnq9ndkBs4sgZ4EXgxSWW=LX0kOK4i88Ww at mail dot gmail dot com> <515B41F5 dot 4040207 at gmail dot com> <CAH6eHdRHGv9hFzoiVV3bGZ74UhVfawc+qkiQY9dS5CwCdW1p4A at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAH6eHdRuc=r2kSQ-xS921CbUBAfSp29h9apvUC3gjpJt+Z4O8A at mail dot gmail dot com> <5174472E dot 5020502 at gmail dot com> <5175E4C4 dot 7080506 at redhat dot com>
On 04/23/2013 03:32 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
I had to apply this patch to get the library to build after your change:
Sorry for the disturbance.
I reproduced the issue once I touch the hashtable_c++0x.cc file. I
guess it is expected that modifying headers don't necessarily force a
rebuild on the dependent source files. In this case is there a make
target to force a rebuild of libstdc++ without rebuilding the whole gcc ?
François