This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Add explicit default constructors where required by the standard


Thanks a lot.
Forgot to mention it earlier, can this be backported in the 4_8 branch as well?

On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 19 April 2013 16:19, Evgeniy Stepanov wrote:
>> Good point, thanks!
>> Revised patch attached.
>
> I've committed that version, thanks very much.
>
>
>> On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 7:00 PM, Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On 19 April 2013 15:42, Evgeniy Stepanov wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> according to n3242 8.5.6,
>>>>
>>>> If a program calls for the default initialization of an object of a
>>>> const-qualiïed type T, T shall be a class type with a user-provided
>>>> default constructor.
>>>>
>>>> This patches fixes 3 places in libstdc++ code where this requirement
>>>> is violated.
>>>
>>> The violation is how the objects are initialized, not how the class is defined.
>>>
>>> I would prefer to just add {} to the initializers not add the constructors.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]