This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Implement Nakagami distribution as an extension.

From: Paolo Carlini <paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com>
To: Ed Smith-Rowland <3dw4rd at verizon dot net>
Cc: Ulrich Drepper <drepper at gmail dot com>, "libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org" <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 16:28:02 +0200
Subject: Re: Implement Nakagami distribution as an extension.
References: <50573F1A.1050000@verizon.net> <CAOPLpQejg+UKtgSf=gqDNg3qARKPOSdhtJ+7Ord3-pTwbXzCzQ@mail.gmail.com> <5057CD07.5050004@verizon.net>

On 09/18/2012 03:23 AM, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:

Here is another tweak for the Nakagami distribution.

operator() is a one liner without a local variable.

The template friend is fixed and the relevant test has been added. Changed dates.

If this version is tested (please remember to say where and how) it's Ok. Thanks!

Paolo.

PS: lately I normally use -std=c++11 for new testcases: IMHO at this point -std=c++0x should be considered a legacy switch.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Implement Nakagami distribution as an extension.
  - From: Ed Smith-Rowland
- Implement Pareto distribution as an extension.
  - From: Ed Smith-Rowland

References:
- Implement Nakagami distribution as an extension.
  - From: Ed Smith-Rowland
- Re: Implement Nakagami distribution as an extension.
  - From: Ulrich Drepper

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]