This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Dealing with C++98/11 ABI incompatibilities

From: Paolo Carlini <paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com>
To: Daniel Krügler <daniel dot kruegler at gmail dot com>
Cc: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>, GCC <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>, libstdc++ <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>, Jeffrey Yasskin <jyasskin at google dot com>
Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2012 22:11:20 +0200
Subject: Re: Dealing with C++98/11 ABI incompatibilities
References: <4FF3458A.2050804@redhat.com> <4FF34FE2.2020708@oracle.com> <CAGNvRgDM_epOo6TVd_Zu_S7+YQOkAiwmS-ftu=mhngf=wsLSwA@mail.gmail.com>

On 07/03/2012 10:10 PM, Daniel Krügler wrote:

Isn't there a similar problem with the long long related additions of virtual function to IO/localization as in std::num_get and std::num_put?

Probably not, because, if I understand correctly what you are saying, we have long long overloads in C++98 mode too. Pretty old stuff.

Paolo.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Dealing with C++98/11 ABI incompatibilities
  - From: Daniel Krügler

References:
- Dealing with C++98/11 ABI incompatibilities
  - From: Jason Merrill
- Re: Dealing with C++98/11 ABI incompatibilities
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: Dealing with C++98/11 ABI incompatibilities
  - From: Daniel Krügler

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]