This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [Ping][PATCH, libstdc++-v3] Enable to cross-test libstdc++ on simulator

From: Paolo Carlini <paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com>
To: Terry Guo <terry dot guo at arm dot com>
Cc: libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE, mikestump at comcast dot net, Richard Earnshaw <Richard dot Earnshaw at arm dot com>, bonzini at gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2012 13:40:06 +0100
Subject: Re: [Ping][PATCH, libstdc++-v3] Enable to cross-test libstdc++ on simulator
References: <000001ccfc22$59706ed0$0c514c70$@guo@arm.com>

Hi,

On 03/07/2012 06:22 AM, Terry Guo wrote:

Hello,
Can anybody please review and approve the following simple patch? Thanks
very much.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2011-08/msg00063.html

apparently somebody, somewhere, approved this patch, because I see:

2012-03-13 Terry Guo <terry.guo@arm.com>

* testsuite/Makefile.in (TEST_GCC_EXEC_PREFIX): New.

but frankly the commit as-is didn't make much sense, because the *.in files are generated: a sensible patch should have touched the *.am file and then, upon approval, committed also the files change by 'autoreconf'.

Anyway, the change doesn't exist anymore, because the next 'autoreconf' (of mine, as it happens) of course wiped it out.

Please clarify.

Thanks,
Paolo.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Ping][PATCH, libstdc++-v3] Enable to cross-test libstdc++ on simulator
  - From: Paolo Bonzini

References:
- [Ping][PATCH, libstdc++-v3] Enable to cross-test libstdc++ on simulator
  - From: Terry Guo

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]