This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [v3] define string::pop_back()

From: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at adacore dot com>
To: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, "libstdc++" <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2011 10:40:23 +0100
Subject: Re: [v3] define string::pop_back()
References: <CAH6eHdS5iBXR-KZJRC1wx_TCTN2d2G721dCCu_JtXYG1RgjQZw@mail.gmail.com> <201111071017.10685.ebotcazou@adacore.com> <CAH6eHdTvTGmphKpPSqVG8hcHMVSqbMnnSvzZ2gHsgHR4NhCQmA@mail.gmail.com>

> Thanks, I'll try to work out the right adjustment for the solaris
> symbols file but can't test it.

The 2 new symbols are duplicated, because they are matched by a regexp:

    ##_ZNSs[0-58-9][g-z]* (glob)
    _ZNSs4nposE;
    _ZNSs4rendEv;
    _ZNSs4swapERSs;
    _ZNSs8pop_backEv;
    _ZNSs9push_backEc;

    ##_ZNSbIwSt11char_traitsIwESaIwEE[0-58-9][g-z]* (glob)
    _ZNSbIwSt11char_traitsIwESaIwEE4nposE;
    _ZNSbIwSt11char_traitsIwESaIwEE4rendEv;
    _ZNSbIwSt11char_traitsIwESaIwEE4swapERS2_;
    _ZNSbIwSt11char_traitsIwESaIwEE8pop_backEv;
    _ZNSbIwSt11char_traitsIwESaIwEE9push_backEw;

so removing the 8 in the regexp seems to be sufficient.

-- 
Eric Botcazou

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [v3] define string::pop_back()
  - From: Jonathan Wakely

References:
- Re: [v3] define string::pop_back()
  - From: Eric Botcazou
- Re: [v3] define string::pop_back()
  - From: Jonathan Wakely

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]