This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: hash policy patch

From: Paolo Carlini <paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com>
To: François Dumont <frs dot dumont at gmail dot com>
Cc: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at gmail dot com>, "libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org" <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 23:53:56 +0200
Subject: Re: hash policy patch
References: <4E2F1A56.3010000@free.fr> <4E2F204B.6060207@oracle.com> <4E31C6CE.2070906@free.fr> <7B3982F6-FEAA-4023-AC36-84B10A513651@oracle.com> <4E3849E9.5000505@free.fr> <4E5FD090.8070102@oracle.com> <4E666E75.8020600@gmail.com> <4E667219.90403@oracle.com> <4E6675EA.3090608@oracle.com> <4E667B1A.8060806@gmail.com>

Hi,

Ok, I let you finalize this part then, indeed long double will be even better.

I had plan on my side to use a '+ 1' on calls to the refactored _M_next_bkt, but I think a ceil should be fine too.

The below is what I'm finishing testing on x86_64-linux multilib and I mean to commit later today. Looking forward to the rest of the work in split out form...

Thanks!
Paolo.

//////////////////

Attachment: CL
Description: Text document

Attachment: p
Description: Text document

References:
- Re: hash policy patch
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: hash policy patch
  - From: François Dumont
- Re: hash policy patch
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: hash policy patch
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: hash policy patch
  - From: François Dumont

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]