This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: using xlocale to implement std::locale class


On 05/06/2011 12:58 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Hi,
Not sure what that fail is all about. I'll see what I can figure out.
Thanks. I suspect the issue could be relatively simple and unrelated to the actual management of the message catalogs: completely similar tests, a few lines before do succeed, only different because involving the 'plain' messages facet instead of the _byname version. I can't believe the issue is very tough, and apparently Francois didn't focus much on the _byname version... Please let me know how it goes.
Ah good, I think the failing test is actually invalid. We have:

  catalog cat_de = mssg_de.open("libstdc++", loc_c, dir);
  string s01 = mssg_de.get(cat_de, 0, 0, "please");
  string s02 = mssg_de.get(cat_de, 0, 0, "thank you");
  VERIFY ( s01 == "bitte" );
  VERIFY ( s02 == "danke" );
  mssg_de.close(cat_de);

  // Check byname locale.
  catalog cat_byname = mssg_byname.open("libstdc++", loc_c, dir);
  string s03 = mssg_byname.get(cat_de, 0, 0, "please");
  string s04 = mssg_byname.get(cat_de, 0, 0, "thank you");
  VERIFY ( s03 == "bitte" );
  VERIFY ( s04 == "danke" );
  mssg_byname.close(cat_byname);

and the second couple of VERIFY fails. But the two mssg_byname.get are *not* guaranteed to work, because, per 22.2.7.1.2/1 (C++03), about do_open: "The result can be used until it is passed to close" and this condition is violated for the second pair of cat_de uses. Actually, I guess I'm going to apply the below first.

Paolo.

///////////////////

Attachment: p
Description: Text document


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]