This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [v3] Don't create unlinkable 64-bit libtestc++.a on IRIX 6

From: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
To: Rainer Orth <ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE>
Cc: Paolo Carlini <paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com>, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 17:23:50 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: Re: [v3] Don't create unlinkable 64-bit libtestc++.a on IRIX 6
References: <ydd1v624xe7.fsf@manam.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE> <ydd1v5uc0qr.fsf@manam.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE> <4CFD15BE.60305@oracle.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1012061658390.24133@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <yddk4jmakg3.fsf@manam.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>

On Mon, 6 Dec 2010, Rainer Orth wrote:

> On the other hand, there are many unadorned invocations of remote_file
> build delete in gcc/testsuite/lib.  Do you have an idea when the above
> construct might be necessary?  It would be really helpful to have a
> library of Tcl procs for use all over the Dejagnu testsuites in GCC.

I don't know more than the empirical observation leading to the code I 
quoted: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-07/msg00163.html>.

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [v3] Don't create unlinkable 64-bit libtestc++.a on IRIX 6
  - From: Rainer Orth

References:
- Re: [v3] Don't create unlinkable 64-bit libtestc++.a on IRIX 6
  - From: Rainer Orth
- Re: [v3] Don't create unlinkable 64-bit libtestc++.a on IRIX 6
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: [v3] Don't create unlinkable 64-bit libtestc++.a on IRIX 6
  - From: Joseph S. Myers
- Re: [v3] Don't create unlinkable 64-bit libtestc++.a on IRIX 6
  - From: Rainer Orth

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]