This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: regex patch

From: "Stephen M. Webb" <stephenw dot webb at bregmasoft dot ca>
To: Paolo Carlini <paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com>
Cc: stephen dot webb at bregmasoft dot ca, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org, Jonathan Wakely <jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com>
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 15:42:07 -0400
Subject: Re: regex patch
References: <201006181332.51474.stephenw.webb@bregmasoft.ca>
References: <201006181523.58337.stephenw.webb@bregmasoft.ca>
References: <4C1BC8CE.5090609@oracle.com>
Reply-to: stephen dot webb at bregmasoft dot ca

On 18/06/10 15:28, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> On 06/18/2010 09:23 PM, Stephen M. Webb wrote:
> > One last question, though. This introduces an abi_check failure.
> > Should that
> > be fixed first?
>
> For sure. No regressions, please.

Wait a minute... this abi_check failure is due to 220 added symbols, many of 
them nothing to do with <regex>... stuff like std::future_error::what() 
const.  Only 4 are marked as "incompatible," and they're new symbols being 
added as well so I don't understand why they're incompatible.

Would this constitute a regression?

-- 
Stephen M. Webb
stephen.webb@bregmasoft.ca

Follow-Ups:
- Re: regex patch
  - From: Paolo Carlini

References:
- regex patch
  - From: Stephen M. Webb
- Re: regex patch
  - From: Paolo Carlini

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]