This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Hi all, hi Jon, I'm about to commit this patch adding two missing std::hash specializations... Jon, skimming through unique_ptr.h I don't really understand why we are using std::tuple instead of the *much* simpler std::pair. Can you? I think that otherwise we should consider changing that, even if that means breaking the "ABI" for people already experimenting with the C++0x unique_ptr, because in the future it will be more and more difficult... If we can avoid using tuple in unique_ptr, I think <memory> can be made *much* smaller (it used to be very small), because I'm pretty sure we don't need the entire <functional>, only some bits, like functional_hash, and very little else. Tested x86_64-linux. Paolo. /////////////////////
Attachment:
CL_su_hash
Description: Text document
Attachment:
patch_su_hash
Description: Text document
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |