This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [v3] libstdc++/44413 (for ext/vstring)

From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com>
To: Paolo Carlini <paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com>
Cc: Doug Semler <dougsemler at gmail dot com>, "libstdc++" <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Richard Guenther <rguenther at suse dot de>
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2010 22:28:49 +0100
Subject: Re: [v3] libstdc++/44413 (for ext/vstring)
References: <4C0F5D67.9010405@oracle.com> <AANLkTikQK8oOy3jRmpTV7NrtuYAfcr3haQ71DY4lusUY@mail.gmail.com> <4C0FA322.4050602@oracle.com> <AANLkTims-8Xj8pmIhk9Zm71-NFOLDuW9u7Pp3we_da9T@mail.gmail.com> <4C0FACF0.6050808@oracle.com> <AANLkTikWJ8V2-GEKdPzHFPcWSkJ6Z98CY-zk-hz9wt29@mail.gmail.com> <4C0FDC07.6090506@oracle.com>

I don't like the idea of different behaviour for 32bit (return any
value from INT_MIN to INT_MAX) and 64bit code (return -1, 0 or +1)
even if it does save a few instructions.

References:
- [v3] libstdc++/44413 (for ext/vstring)
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: [v3] libstdc++/44413 (for ext/vstring)
  - From: Doug Semler
- Re: [v3] libstdc++/44413 (for ext/vstring)
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: [v3] libstdc++/44413 (for ext/vstring)
  - From: Doug Semler
- Re: [v3] libstdc++/44413 (for ext/vstring)
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: [v3] libstdc++/44413 (for ext/vstring)
  - From: Doug Semler
- Re: [v3] libstdc++/44413 (for ext/vstring)
  - From: Paolo Carlini

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]