This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: unsafe STL patch

From: Paolo Carlini <paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com>
To: François Dumont <francois dot cppdevs at free dot fr>
Cc: libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 22:04:30 +0100
Subject: Re: unsafe STL patch
References: <4B5F586C.7050905@free.fr> <4B5F5C2A.9080502@oracle.com> <4B61F770.8010508@free.fr>

... ah yes, I have in mind a more specific comment, about your general
idea: I'm not sure to understand why you are calling .base() only for
random access iterators: as far as I can see, assuming you have a
_Safe_iterator, that's always the correct thing to do...

Paolo.

References:
- unsafe STL patch
  - From: François Dumont
- Re: unsafe STL patch
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: unsafe STL patch
  - From: François Dumont

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]