This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Sampling bug in uniform_real (random)

From: Paolo Carlini <paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com>
To: Gabriel Corona <gabriel dot corona at enst-bretagne dot fr>
Cc: libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 17:23:03 +0100
Subject: Re: Sampling bug in uniform_real (random)
References: <497472D2.7050307@enst-bretagne.fr> <4974906B.5020804@oracle.com> <49749B4B.4010803@enst-bretagne.fr> <49749D85.7010502@oracle.com> <4974A2DC.6020500@enst-bretagne.fr>

Gabriel Corona wrote:
> Sorry, I read the wrong part of 5.1.1.
> So yes this is the correct behaviour for TR1.
> I missed the difference on this point between TR1 and the
> C++0x drafts.
>   
Good, I'm glad we agree about the correct interpretation of TR1. In any
case, it's time to  start seriously work on the C++0x counterpart of
those facilities, which is quite different. You will find few messages
about that a few weeks ago and also some code. If you have special
suggestions, indications, more than welcome!

Paolo.

References:
- Sampling bug in uniform_real (random)
  - From: Gabriel Corona
- Re: Sampling bug in uniform_real (random)
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: Sampling bug in uniform_real (random)
  - From: Gabriel Corona
- Re: Sampling bug in uniform_real (random)
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: Sampling bug in uniform_real (random)
  - From: Gabriel Corona

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]