This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Implementation of forward_list (and compressed_pair)

From: Paolo Carlini <paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com>
To: Chris Fairles <chris dot fairles at gmail dot com>
Cc: Ed Smith-Rowland <3dw4rd at verizon dot net>, libstdc++ <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 13:03:31 +0200
Subject: Re: Implementation of forward_list (and compressed_pair)
References: <48F0EE6E.3000409@verizon.net> <48F1CCFE.5040606@oracle.com> <fac6bb500810120355o629f6d81vd6e4b7f35d13c18c@mail.gmail.com>

Chris Fairles wrote:
> Speaking of interfaces, should tuple's get, tuple_element, tuple_size
> etc. be extended for __compressed_pair like they are for std::pair?
>   
I have an answer for this question: I don't think so, I don't think, in
general, we should keep to a minimum dependencies and links between
Standard facilities and extensions.

About the other issue, I'll leave it to Ed. Agreed, if perfecting
__compressed_pair turns out to be too annoying, we can also base
forward_list on tuple, for now, at least...

Paolo.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Implementation of forward_list (and compressed_pair)
  - From: Ed Smith-Rowland

References:
- Implementation of forward_list (and compressed_pair)
  - From: Ed Smith-Rowland
- Re: Implementation of forward_list (and compressed_pair)
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: Implementation of forward_list (and compressed_pair)
  - From: Chris Fairles

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]