This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Recent libstdc++ regressions

From: "Daniel Berlin" <dberlin at dberlin dot org>
To: "Paolo Carlini" <paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 13:56:58 -0400
Subject: Re: Recent libstdc++ regressions
References: <9769735.1215613876152.JavaMail.oracle@acsmt304.oracle.com> <4aca3dc20807090958v4f5eff9ax8edef455fe613a9c@mail.gmail.com> <487795A6.4010709@oracle.com>

On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 1:17 PM, Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini@oracle.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>>
>> This is likely to have been my patch.
>> I'm minimizing the check_construct_destroy failure right now.
>> If someone could give me some idea of what is causing the execution
>> failures while i do that, i may be able to fix them faster :)
>>
>
> Thanks for fixing the check_construct_destroy problem.
>
> I would suggest concentrating next on the vector/bool failure, which is
> about a standard feature, not an extension. Frankly, I don't have any
> special advice, the testcase is pretty straightforward...

Working on it now :)

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Recent libstdc++ regressions
  - From: Daniel Berlin

References:
- Recent libstdc++ regressions
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: Recent libstdc++ regressions
  - From: Daniel Berlin

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]