This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: [v3 parallel mode] Parallel mode vs. movable
- From: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at suse dot de>
- To: Johannes Singler <singler at ira dot uka dot de>
- Cc: libstdc++ <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Chris Jefferson <chris at bubblescope dot net>
- Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 11:53:20 +0100
- Subject: Re: [v3 parallel mode] Parallel mode vs. movable
- References: <47E8D69A.5060405@ira.uka.de>
Johannes Singler wrote:
However, the error seems to appear inside the sequential sort routine.
The parallelized routine uses sequential sort, while the sequential
partial_sort does not. And AFAICS the movable test is switched off for
regular sort. So what's the current status? Is sequential "sort"
currently "movable-safe"?
I see. Indeed, std::sort isn't "moveable-safe" yet. I wanted to move
over the v7-branch changes but seemed a bit invasive and heavy-handed,
hopefully we can do that soon, now, in mainline. CC-ing Chris, in case
he wants to help on that...
Paolo.