This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [v3] update libtool_VERSION

From: Andreas Schwab <schwab at suse dot de>
To: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 10:42:14 +0100
Subject: Re: [v3] update libtool_VERSION
References: <20080318123259.748bb089@wabash.artheist.org> <jelk4fsype.fsf@sykes.suse.de> <20080318150536.033639be@wabash.artheist.org> <jeprtrbxhb.fsf@sykes.suse.de> <20080318164126.4e02c839@wabash.artheist.org> <jelk4fbse0.fsf@sykes.suse.de> <20080318235643.7a50aee8@wabash.artheist.org>

Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz@redhat.com> writes:

> So, why the insistence that we change the way we versioning now?

I don't insist.  If libstdc++ is following a different versioning scheme
than the one recommended by libtool I'm fine with it.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
PGP key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."

References:
- [v3] update libtool_VERSION
  - From: Benjamin Kosnik
- Re: [v3] update libtool_VERSION
  - From: Andreas Schwab
- Re: [v3] update libtool_VERSION
  - From: Benjamin Kosnik
- Re: [v3] update libtool_VERSION
  - From: Andreas Schwab
- Re: [v3] update libtool_VERSION
  - From: Benjamin Kosnik
- Re: [v3] update libtool_VERSION
  - From: Andreas Schwab
- Re: [v3] update libtool_VERSION
  - From: Benjamin Kosnik

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]