This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [Patch / RFA] Use builtins for the classification macros

From: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at suse dot de>
To: Richard Guenther <rguenther at suse dot de>
Cc: libstdc++ <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 17:48:38 +0100
Subject: Re: [Patch / RFA] Use builtins for the classification macros
References: <474AB15B.8000603@suse.de> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0711261339370.4148@zhemvz.fhfr.qr> <474AC78F.3030004@suse.de> <474AC9AA.4080602@suse.de> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0711261751020.4148@zhemvz.fhfr.qr>

Richard Guenther wrote:
> I'll have a look tomorrow.
>   
Thanks a lot Richard. By the way, I decided to add today's improvement
together with fixing libstdc++/25913 itself. Which means, all the
functions in namespace std will be guarded with enable_if and, likely,
tomorrow the testcase will not fail anymore for you. However, preparing
a reproducer should be absolutely trivial: just feed __builtin_isnormal
a user defined type...

Paolo.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Patch / RFA] Use builtins for the classification macros
  - From: Richard Guenther

References:
- [Patch / RFA] Use builtins for the classification macros
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: [Patch / RFA] Use builtins for the classification macros
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: [Patch / RFA] Use builtins for the classification macros
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: [Patch / RFA] Use builtins for the classification macros
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: [Patch / RFA] Use builtins for the classification macros
  - From: Richard Guenther

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]