This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: [v3] special math vs. C++0x test
- From: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
- To: Ed Smith-Rowland <3dw4rd at verizon dot net>
- Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, libstdc++ <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Tue, 08 May 2007 17:07:28 +0200
- Subject: Re: [v3] special math vs. C++0x test
- References: <46405532.700@redhat.com> <46407606.9080900@verizon.net>
I'm confused. Did the TR1 special math functions just make it into the
standard?
I haven't seen anything later than 03-2007 on open-std.org.
This is confusing: a negative test that is xfailed. Translated, it means
that it's supposed to not compile, but does.
This is similar to the negative tests here:
* testsuite/20_util/headers/type_traits/types_std_c++0x_neg.cc:
Add a temporary xfail to this test for all platforms.
Does this make it clear?
best,
benjamin