This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: -Wconversion versus libstdc++

On 18/01/07, Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@cs.tamu.edu> wrote:
On Wed, 17 Jan 2007, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:

| On 17/01/07, Paolo Carlini <pcarlini@suse.de> wrote:
| > ... thanks a lot Gaby both for your practical and theoretical
| > investigations into this issue, both right to the point! Now, in my
| > opinion, we should simply remove the bits about signed -> unsigned from
| > -Wconversion.
| >
|
| I am not sure I am following the conversation.

here it is in pseudo-code.

   int x = some value;
   // ...
   unsigned y = x  // please don't spit noise here


Does that apply also to:

unsigned int y = -10;

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]