This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: C++ PATCH: PR 20599 (1/3)

From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>
To: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at suse dot de>, Doug Gregor <doug dot gregor at gmail dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, libstdc++ <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: 19 Sep 2006 00:31:26 +0200
Subject: Re: C++ PATCH: PR 20599 (1/3)
References: <FEC59D4C-899B-417C-BC01-193397613C05@cs.indiana.edu> <24b520d20609141104y562fa3eft966df4d370cf0e78@mail.gmail.com> <450A658C.7050109@suse.de> <450F024C.9030904@codesourcery.com>

Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com> writes:

[...]

| It's easy to say "well, we warned the users, it's their problem" --
| but I don't think that's necessarily how we best convince people to
| prefer G++ to competing alternatives.

I strongly agree.

[...]

| So, I'm somewhat hesitant to incorporate changes before the standard
| is sufficiently final. 

I suspect that is a wise course of action.  I believe development
on branch is a sufficiently good approach and good compromise, until
we get near-dry-ink buy-in from the C++ standards committee.

-- Gaby

Follow-Ups:
- Re: C++ PATCH: PR 20599 (1/3)
  - From: Joe Buck

References:
- Re: C++ PATCH: PR 20599 (1/3)
  - From: Doug Gregor
- Re: C++ PATCH: PR 20599 (1/3)
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: C++ PATCH: PR 20599 (1/3)
  - From: Mark Mitchell

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]