Re: [Patch/RFC] tr1::shared_ptr<> removal of lock, choosing thread safety

[Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at suse dot de>]

Phillip Jordan wrote:

> > My only minor nit would be double (instead of triple) underscore for
> > __enable_shared_from_this;
>
> Ah, I remember now I wanted to ask about the
> __enable_shared_from_this: there is already a function with the double
> underscore name, and I figured that renaming the function and then
> naming the template class with the double underscore was probably a
> bad idea. What should I go with here, and to what do I rename it?

Ah, now I see. I would say, let's use __enable_shared_from_this for the 
base class (consistently with the other bases), and let's rename the 
existing function to something else, according to its semantics. 
Anything simple, close to the existing name can do, you choose...

Thanks,
Paolo.