This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: [v3] libstdc++/26142
Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
>Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz@redhat.com> writes:
>
>| This reverts to previous behavior. In this case, the top level
>| __gnu_debug namespace is composed of std::debug and
>| __gnu_cxx::debug. It's assumed that users could similarly create
>| their own ::debug namespace.
>
>So we assume we reserve the name "debug"?
>I mean, do we document that
>
> #define debug 0
> #include <header-with-debug-behaviour>
>
>is invalid as far as libstdc++ is concerned?
>
>
Yes, I'm really puzzled about this story, I may be missing some
important details... Why aren't we uglifying everything, as usual?!?
Paolo.