This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: const valarray question
- From: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at suse dot de>
- To: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at cs dot tamu dot edu>
- Cc: libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 18:20:45 +0100
- Subject: Re: const valarray question
- References: <200511082052.jA8KqtgR003290@greed.delorie.com> <m38xujbrx3.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net> <43C24579.8050106@suse.de> <873bjw57dc.fsf@soliton.cs.tamu.edu>
Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
>| Gaby, can we have this patch in 4_1-branch too?
>
>Yes.
>
>
Ok, I'll take care of applying it.
>| Also, about the POD issue (now tracked as libstdc++/25626) I think is
>| sufficiently serious from the conformance point of view to warrant a
>| rather urgent action: do you want me to extract a minimal fix from your
>| large draft of a few weeks ago? I think I understand the problem
>| sufficiently well.
>
>the non-POD stuff + valarray is not as serious as you might think; but
>yes, it is a bug in the implementation that should be fixed. I would
>really like to make some cleanups; but I guess that cleanup does not
>need to go with the bug fixing. The bug fixing without the cleanup
>just looks weird to me.
>
>
To be clear: for mainline, at least, I'm *not* against cleanups. Only,
for the time being, let's not break the binary compatibility.
Paolo.