This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Optimzed vs. readable code

From: Pierre THIERRY <nowhere dot man at levallois dot eu dot org>
To: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>
Cc: caj at cs dot york dot ac dot uk, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 12:26:27 +0100
Subject: Re: Optimzed vs. readable code
References: <pan.2005.11.29.16.48.37.733665@levallois.eu.org> <F2B5F487-EF4D-43E4-B2D2-AD7EA914F24F@apple.com> <pan.2005.11.29.22.27.59.180878@levallois.eu.org> <57767.83.70.108.191.1133369588.squirrel@www.cs.york.ac.uk> <20051130171444.GC18129@bateleur.arcanes.fr.eu.org> <m3psohvoow.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net>

Scribit Gabriel Dos Reis dies 30/11/2005 hora 21:57:
> Not just because you'll repeat ad infinitum that you'll have people
> change their mind.

I was expecting my expectations were reasonable, because they were based
on CS courses about compilation and compiler development. If you all
agree the expectations that were the basis of my proposal are wrong,
I'll just have to forget it.

Doubtfully,
Nowhere man
-- 
nowhere.man@levallois.eu.org
OpenPGP 0xD9D50D8A

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Optimzed vs. readable code
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: Optimzed vs. readable code
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]