Re: It's v7-> mainline merge time!

[Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at suse dot de>]

Benjamin Kosnik wrote:

>>Well, my list was more matter of logic dependencies: nothing, besides
>>enabling very few simulated move semantics tests also for debug mode,
>>depends on -3-. By the way, we all agree that issue is important, but I
>>gather that Jason and Benjamin are quickly converging to a satisfactory
>>solution, no need for anyone else help.
>>    
>>
>Hey y'all. I will post details on what is going on here and updated
>status in a few days.
>
>FWIW, I am of the same mind as Gaby, and that I'd like to have move
>semantics solidified and  approved by the committee before dropping
>them on mainline. (Although I heartily approve the the branch work.)
>
>I think 1 and 4 too are best bets for immediate merging, with it making
>sense to do 1 now, since it's been completed.
>  
>
Agreed. I'm going to start on 1 before the end of this week. I will also
post relatively soon mainline versions of the nice
_M_erase_at_end/_M_erase_at_begin bits which I did with Howard's help +
other smaller things I'm finishing up now in v7 (e.g.,
_M_get_Tp_allocator by ref)

Paolo.