This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: compile/runtime testing for __cxa_atexit
- From: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at suse dot de>
- To: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
- Cc: libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2005 19:28:24 +0200
- Subject: Re: compile/runtime testing for __cxa_atexit
- References: <20050831170206.0162160b.bkoz@redhat.com> <431631A5.9000803@suse.de> <20050831181146.5810daa3.bkoz@redhat.com> <43163E8B.5080704@suse.de> <20050901122151.393547a0.bkoz@redhat.com>
Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
>The main advantage of the dejagnu requires style is that it doesn't
>impose naming conventions like "thread" and "wchar_t" to be part of the
>full path name. However, I don't consider this to be a big deal, and to
>be honest, I think we need to organize a lot of the testsuite along
>these lines anyway, as it matches the functionality of the standard. I
>suspect this was your point?
>
>
Exactly.
>What I really like, with both approaches, is that the "unsupported"
>tests are now numbered accurately. I find that a big help! The current
>results are much more accurate for systems like Solaris and AIX.
>
>
Yes! More generally, I agree completely with you on every account: in
case I figure out something else, more specific, I will tell you later...
Thanks for now,
Paolo.