This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Testing the last move-semantics patch

From: chris jefferson <caj at cs dot york dot ac dot uk>
To: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at suse dot de>
Cc: libstdc++ <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 15:03:12 +0100
Subject: Re: Testing the last move-semantics patch
References: <428D2472.3060108@suse.de>

Paolo Carlini wrote:

Hi Chris,

I'm finally testing your last patch extensively, everything looks good
so far and I'm positive to apply it tomorrow. Only wanted to double
check with you the results for testsuite with -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG: besides
the expected failures summarized by Jonathan here
(http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2005-05/msg00089.html) I'm seeing no
failures in 25_algorithms and all the moveable.cc failing in
23_containers. I think this is what you wanted to accomplish.

Yup. I am intending on getting rvalref, _GLIBCXX_DEBUG and the containers to live together happily, but I'm still undecided what the best way is...

Chris

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Testing the last move-semantics patch
  - From: Paolo Carlini

References:
- Testing the last move-semantics patch
  - From: Paolo Carlini

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]