This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Adding moving to basic_string

From: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at suse dot de>
To: chris jefferson <caj at cs dot york dot ac dot uk>
Cc: Jonathan Wakely <cow at compsoc dot man dot ac dot uk>, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 14:32:25 +0200
Subject: Re: Adding moving to basic_string
References: <4288DBAE.2040408@cs.york.ac.uk> <4288E14E.8060002@suse.de> <4288F07C.6080401@cs.york.ac.uk> <4288F4F6.6040805@suse.de> <4289CDC4.9010702@cs.york.ac.uk> <20050517113403.GA94443@compsoc.man.ac.uk> <4289E069.1010400@cs.york.ac.uk>

chris jefferson wrote:

> You are also right, this kind of stealing of internal representation
> would work on a ref-counted copy too.. so it looks like this whole
> thing is tackling a useful, but totally different problem.. woops :)

:) I agree with you and Jonathan about the first point, less about the
second ;) Really, when reference-counting doesn't help us, we have to
pay even more attention to avoiding memory allocations and memcpy.

Paolo.

References:
- [patch] : Add move symantics to more of libstdc++
  - From: chris jefferson
- Re: [patch] : Add move symantics to more of libstdc++
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: [patch] : Add move symantics to more of libstdc++
  - From: chris jefferson
- Re: [patch] : Add move symantics to more of libstdc++
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Adding moving to basic_string
  - From: chris jefferson
- Re: Adding moving to basic_string
  - From: Jonathan Wakely
- Re: Adding moving to basic_string
  - From: chris jefferson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]