This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: PATCH: testsuite/26_numerics/c99_classification_macros_c.cc

From: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
To: Ben Elliston <bje at au1 dot ibm dot com>
Cc: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at suse dot de>, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2005 18:12:55 -0600
Subject: Re: PATCH: testsuite/26_numerics/c99_classification_macros_c.cc
Organization: Red Hat / Chicago
References: <422E646C.3070009@au.ibm.com><422ECADD.2090200@suse.de><422ECE5E.5060400@suse.de><422F8F9D.4050800@au.ibm.com>

> Any objections to the c99_classification_macros_c.cc case, or shall I commit that, too?

This case should fail without PCH. I believe it still does. 

However, this is Gaby's call. I think on the release branch, we should
do this, just to avoid confusion. 

-benjamin

Follow-Ups:
- Re: PATCH: testsuite/26_numerics/c99_classification_macros_c.cc
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis

References:
- PATCH: testsuite/26_numerics/c99_classification_macros_c.cc
  - From: Ben Elliston
- Re: PATCH: testsuite/26_numerics/c99_classification_macros_c.cc
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: PATCH: testsuite/26_numerics/c99_classification_macros_c.cc
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: PATCH: testsuite/26_numerics/c99_classification_macros_c.cc
  - From: Ben Elliston

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]