This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [libstdc++ PATCH] Fix leak in _Rb_tree::_M_insert (stl_tree.h)

From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>
To: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at suse dot de>
Cc: Earl Chew <earl_chew at agilent dot com>, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: 25 Feb 2005 14:22:53 +0100
Subject: Re: [libstdc++ PATCH] Fix leak in _Rb_tree::_M_insert (stl_tree.h)
Organization: Integrable Solutions
References: <421E8AE2.1050108@agilent.com><m3sm3le3qw.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net><421EFC0F.8050901@suse.de>

Paolo Carlini <pcarlini@suse.de> writes:

| Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
| 
| >Would there be a way to systematize these expclicit try-block without
| >efficiency loss (a la RAII or sentry)?
| >
| Indeed, seems a nice medium-term project! But I agree with Chew that
| short-term we should probably just consistently use a try/catch here. I'd
| like to apply his patch to mainline, 4.0, 3.4 (and 3.3 too?)

OK for all.

-- Gaby

References:
- [libstdc++ PATCH] Fix leak in _Rb_tree::_M_insert (stl_tree.h)
  - From: Earl Chew
- Re: [libstdc++ PATCH] Fix leak in _Rb_tree::_M_insert (stl_tree.h)
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: [libstdc++ PATCH] Fix leak in _Rb_tree::_M_insert (stl_tree.h)
  - From: Paolo Carlini

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]