This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [v3] C99 complex math vs. std::complex

From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>
To: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at suse dot de>
Cc: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: 25 Jan 2005 20:42:35 +0100
Subject: Re: [v3] C99 complex math vs. std::complex
Organization: Integrable Solutions
References: <20050124175805.405003d8@belmont.artheist.org><m34qh69qo8.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net><41F68315.6070107@suse.de><m3wtu1pddr.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net><41F693AC.3010001@suse.de><m3k6q1pcpp.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net><41F695D2.20807@suse.de>

Paolo Carlini <pcarlini@suse.de> writes:

| Completely, absolutely unrelated: I tried to clarify this adding blank lines
| in the ChangeLog. If you agree with the substance, I can use three separate
| ChangeLogs...

OK.  Thanks!

-- Gaby

References:
- [v3] C99 complex math vs. std::complex
  - From: Benjamin Kosnik
- Re: [v3] C99 complex math vs. std::complex
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: [v3] C99 complex math vs. std::complex
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: [v3] C99 complex math vs. std::complex
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: [v3] C99 complex math vs. std::complex
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: [v3] C99 complex math vs. std::complex
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: [v3] C99 complex math vs. std::complex
  - From: Paolo Carlini

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]