This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [v3] C99 complex math vs. std::complex

From: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at suse dot de>
To: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>
Cc: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org,rittle at latour dot waar dot labs dot mot dot com
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 18:34:13 +0100
Subject: Re: [v3] C99 complex math vs. std::complex
References: <20050124175805.405003d8@belmont.artheist.org> <m34qh69qo8.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net>

Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:

(tangentially, does anybody know that _BUGGY_COMPLEX is still relevant? That is for so_7 branch...)

Since May, 2001, nothing in the autoconf machinery sets it anymore
and seems completely dead.

If people agree, I can just remove it, together with a few small additional
tweaks and clean-ups that I mentioned yesterday.

Paolo.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [v3] C99 complex math vs. std::complex
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: [v3] C99 complex math vs. std::complex
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis

References:
- [v3] C99 complex math vs. std::complex
  - From: Benjamin Kosnik
- Re: [v3] C99 complex math vs. std::complex
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]