This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: libtool patch

From: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
To: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
Cc: kcook at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2004 09:15:59 -0600
Subject: Re: libtool patch
Organization: Red Hat / Chicago
References: <20041125095720.4f3f0018.bkoz@redhat.com><oru0rcyfbb.fsf@livre.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br>

Sorry Alexandre, I wasn't clear about the patch in question and my title
was quite vague.


>> 3) you need to bump AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE from 1.9.1 to 1.9.3, and
>> regenerate configure.
>
>Why is the bump needed?  Does the libtool patch introduce any
>dependencies on automake 1.9.3?  I didn't think so.

libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:

2004-11-25  Kelley Cook  <kcook@gcc.gnu.org>

        * configure: Regenerate for libtool reversion.

2004-11-24  Kelley Cook  <kcook@gcc.gnu.org>

        * configure: Regenerate for libtool change.

2004-11-24  Kelley Cook  <kcook@gcc.gnu.org>

        * Makefile.in, aclocal.m4: Regenerate with automake 1.9.3.
        * include/Makefile.in: Likewise.
        * libmath/Makefile.in: Likewise.
        * libsupc++/Makefile.in: Likewise.
        * po/Makefile.in: Likewise.
        * src/Makefile.in: Likewise.
        * testsuite/Makefile.in: Likewise.

I'm talking about the last one for 1,2,3,4. I agree, the toplevel libtool bits don't apply.

-benjamin

References:
- libtool patch
  - From: Benjamin Kosnik
- Re: libtool patch
  - From: Alexandre Oliva

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]