This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Should basic_*stream::is_open() be const?

On Fri, 2004-08-13 at 12:09, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> Andreas Kohn wrote:
> 
> >So, if I read this correctly, "Note that implementers can make this
> >change in a binary compatible way by providing both overloads; this
> >would be a conforming extension." overloads could be added to libstdc++
> >without violating the standard?
> >
> >Is anything like that planned?
> >  
> >
> Ok, I'm going to apply the below to mainline (would be 3.5.0 or 4.0), not to
> the release branch, however, since we want complete backward and forward
> compatibility.
> 
That's great, thank you very much.

--
Andreas

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]