This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: PATCH: Fix linkage in libsupc++
Mark Mitchell <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
| Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
| >| I have looked at this part of the standard before, and despite the
| >| language that you cite, I am not convinced that in my example above
| >| the compiler should check that the two declarations of "f" match. For
| >| example, if the first were "void f(int)" must the compiler issue an
| >| error? I think that program is ill-formed, because of the language
| >| you cite, but I see nothing that would cause name lookup for the
| >| definition to find the version in the namespace.
| > | | If the committee disagrees with me, then we have a compiler bug.
| >I think we have a compiler bug. But a definitive word from the
| > committe cannot hurt. Do you want me to raise this on -core?
| Yes, please.
Done. See message c++std-core-10614 which concurs with my previous
sentiment that a diagnostic is required.