This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [Lsb-wg] opposition to LSB 2.0 rc1


On Maw, 2004-08-03 at 00:36, anderson@freestandards.org wrote:
> This is what we have been saying all along, though we haven't used the
> term 'stopgap'. LSB 2.0 is based on what's in the field today, and has a
> bounded lifespan. LSB 3.0 will be based on a later version, and likewise
> will probably have a bounded lifespan.

The "stopgap" or some marketing equivalent of that is important IMHO. As
is not sticking stopgaps into ISO submissions.

Call it "stopgap" call it "interim" call it "oh shit" I don't care, but
recognize the importance of the message please.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]