This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFC] std::string(0);

From: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
To: Dhruv Matani <dhruvbird at gmx dot net>
Cc: Jonathan Wakely <cow at compsoc dot man dot ac dot uk>, libstdc++ <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 12:31:38 -0400
Subject: Re: [RFC] std::string(0);
References: <cac9qs$v2f$1@sea.gmane.org><20040611161554.GA82121@compsoc.man.ac.uk><cacn6e$6uo$1@sea.gmane.org> <40C9E9FE.4040109@roguewave.com><cacreq$kai$1@sea.gmane.org><20040611181803.GD25518@tofu.dreamhost.com><40C9FD5B.3040603@roguewave.com><1087011411.1364.10.camel@localhost.localdomain><20040614082054.GA42929@compsoc.man.ac.uk><1087226903.1367.10.camel@localhost.localdomain>

On 14 Jun 2004 21:04:05 +0530, Dhruv Matani <dhruvbird@gmx.net> wrote:

> However, that brings another thing to my mind. I have seen at many
> places stuff like this:
>
> &*end();
>
> So, would the above be valid?

I believe there's still an open core language issue about that :}

Jason

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC] std::string(0);
  - From: Dhruv Matani

References:
- [RFC] std::string(0);
  - From: Daniel Frey
- Re: [RFC] std::string(0);
  - From: Jonathan Wakely
- Re: [RFC] std::string(0);
  - From: Daniel Frey
- Re: [RFC] std::string(0);
  - From: Martin Sebor
- Re: [RFC] std::string(0);
  - From: Daniel Frey
- Re: [RFC] std::string(0);
  - From: Nathan Myers
- Re: [RFC] std::string(0);
  - From: Martin Sebor
- Re: [RFC] std::string(0);
  - From: Dhruv Matani
- Re: [RFC] std::string(0);
  - From: Jonathan Wakely
- Re: [RFC] std::string(0);
  - From: Dhruv Matani

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]