This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: patch: mt_allocator.h

From: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at suse dot de>
To: Dhruv Matani <dhruvbird at gmx dot net>
Cc: libstdc++ <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2004 15:57:16 +0200
Subject: Re: patch: mt_allocator.h
References: <1086634122.2932.9.camel@localhost.localdomain> <40C4B7F6.90408@suse.de> <1086669098.1289.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> <40C5D256.1070004@suse.de> <1086749065.1259.4.camel@localhost.localdomain> <40C6BB8D.40102@suse.de> <1086784364.3800.1.camel@localhost.localdomain>

Dhruv Matani wrote:

Here is the patch. check & check-performance on x86-linux.

I'm still seeing "half" of the allocator inside __gnu_internal. Didn't you agree that probably it's more clean to have all of it inside __gnu_cxx?

Paolo.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: patch: mt_allocator.h
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: patch: mt_allocator.h
  - From: Dhruv Matani

References:
- patch: mt_allocator.h
  - From: Dhruv Matani
- Re: patch: mt_allocator.h
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: patch: mt_allocator.h
  - From: Dhruv Matani
- Re: patch: mt_allocator.h
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: patch: mt_allocator.h
  - From: Dhruv Matani
- Re: patch: mt_allocator.h
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: patch: mt_allocator.h
  - From: Dhruv Matani

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]