This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [v3] libstdc++/12854

From: Zack Weinberg <zack at codesourcery dot com>
To: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>
Cc: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, jason at redhat dot com
Date: Mon, 17 May 2004 22:37:23 -0700
Subject: Re: [v3] libstdc++/12854
References: <20040515172631.6868c1fd.bkoz@redhat.com><m37jvdc7r3.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net><20040517085218.71566d3b.bkoz@redhat.com><m3oeomxwct.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net>

Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@integrable-solutions.net> writes:
> | Using -Weffc++ with libstdc++ without these patches is pretty much
> | impossible.
>
> The compiler should not be warning in system headers in the first
> place.  Something is going wrong there.

It's probably a case of the warning issues when the objectionable
construct is *used*, outside the system header?

zw

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [v3] libstdc++/12854
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis

References:
- [v3] libstdc++/12854
  - From: Benjamin Kosnik
- Re: [v3] libstdc++/12854
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: [v3] libstdc++/12854
  - From: Benjamin Kosnik
- Re: [v3] libstdc++/12854
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]