This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: [RFC] _NL_NUMERIC_*_WC vs _NL_MONETARY_*_WC
- From: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
- To: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at suse dot de>
- Cc: libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org, schwab at suse dot de
- Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2004 21:21:36 -0500
- Subject: Re: [RFC] _NL_NUMERIC_*_WC vs _NL_MONETARY_*_WC
- Organization: Red Hat / Chicago
- References: <4073112D.1050604@suse.de>
> _NL_MONETARY_DECIMAL_POINT_WC
> _NL_MONETARY_THOUSANDS_SEP_WC
There's no reason not to do this.
> __MON_GROUPING
... or this...
> DECIMAL_POINT
> THOUSANDS_SEP
... or this. For the first two bits, the numeric and monetary bits
should always be equivalent, but there is no harm in using the monetary
bits explicitly.
-benjamin