This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: Fwd: Re: [Patch] Remove workaround for copy_backward
On Sunday 28 September 2003 03:32 pm, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> (3) breaks conforming codes (even if we may disagree on their being
> good practice)
>
> I'd take my favorite example, page 9 from
> http://www.cmla.ens-cachan.fr/~dosreis/C++/talks/generic-programming-in-cxx
>.pdf
>
> #include <vector>
> struct X {
> explicit X(int) { }
> };
>
> int main()
> {
> std::vector<X> w(25, 4); // OK
> }
>
> With enable-if work-around as proposed, the above will be
> (incorrectly) rejected. If you think it is contrived example (and
> I conceide the point), think
>
> std::vector<std::vector<int> > matrix(3, 3);
>
> I've already seen codes like that.
>
> -- Gaby
This is the killer argument, then, against using the enable-if workaround. I
suppose (but can't confirm) that the fact that the above works was an
unintended consequence of the use of static_cast<> in the specification. Have
you submitted a DR on this? If not, should someone do so?
Doug